The term used by the author: primary irrationality, constitutes the amalgam of the ontological interiority –according to his own interpretive analysis– of the individual. ~ Recognition through the psychoanalytical observance of this central ontological system, the author assumes that if this is achieved, and the acceptance of this (primary irrationality) follows, then all the remaining (subsequent) "irrationalities" will become ontological. In other words, they will make sense for the being (always according to its own subjectivity). ~ Consequently, these other "irrationalities", indeterminate as they are and often which the individual tries to delineate and elucidate, a veil of the Primary –defined by the author as falsified irrationalities– will cease to have the same falsified substance (of non-acceptance).